And another counterfeit word from the GLBT community is the word “transgendered”

which is ridiculously inaccurate since no human being has ever impregnated a female

and bore a child. (Will somebody please tell me that I’m not the only one noticing this?)

     Also, I’ve noticed that any public figure who doesn’t say the phrase, “...and there’s

nothing wrong with that...” whenever speaking about a member of the GLBT community is

in danger of being labeled as a “homophobe” or a person who is “anti-gay.” And then

there’s the word “intolerance” which, ironically, the gay community is guilty of since one of

the definitions of “intolerance” is a refusal to accept new ideas and homosexuality is

older than the Bible.

     Wow. What a dilemma. How do I escape stigma and speak the truth? Can I separate

from those who equate “tolerate” with “validate?” Can I expose those I oppose with the

blows of my prose? Who knows? Here goes...

    It was somewhere around 1982 when I first heard the “born gay” concept, and it took me twenty years to figure out that people can actually deceive themselves into believing that they were born “gay,” whilst common-sense observations about the human species prove them wrong. 

   The “born gay” concept is in direct opposition to the ridiculously obvious pattern of human reproduction.  Human beings reproduce sexually.  This means that people who say that they were “born gay” are, in effect, saying that nature has chosen to remove their ability to reproduce. 

   Except for the very, very, very few that are born sterile, nature doesn’t do that. 

   Nature is, very obviously, dedicated to the reproduction of all species of life.  Why would nature create a life form with millions of cells and remove that life form’s attraction to the opposite sex which is necessary for the propagation of the species? 

     Wouldn’t a human being that was born without the desire to mate with the opposite

gender be able to reproduce asexually like some other species? How can a cockroach be

born pregnant and a human be born gay? Judging by the complexities of the human psyche,

isn’t it a hundred times more likely that people have convinced themselves that they were

born gay? Isn’t the “born gay” concept an ideological Titanic?

     I once saw a television news story about identical twin boys where one was gay and the

other was straight. Also, when my wife was in high school, she knew a set of identical twin

boys and a set of identical twin girls where one of the twin boys was straight and the other

gay, and one of the twin girls was gay and the other straight. How can one twin be born

gay and the other straight when they’re genetically identical?

     What about the media-ignored, ex-gay community? The entertainer Little Richard is a

former homosexual and a man named Steven Bennett, also a former homosexual, is the

head pastor of a church that reaches out to the GLBT community called Steven Bennett

Ministries. Wasn’t Anne Heche “gay” for a time and now a married (to a man) mother?

Then there’s Exodus International, a ministry that’s full of formerly “gay” people. Also,

I’ve personally known three men that were once homosexuals and aren’t anymore.

      Because of my time and travels on planet Earth, I’ve spoken, at length, to at least one

hundred and seventy homosexuals and at least eighty lesbians. And when I sifted through

all of the bits and pieces of information that I’ve gathered from talking to members of the

GLBT community, I came to the conclusion that the gay lifestyle, although not an overnight

choice, still begins as a choice, sparked by sudden and/or gradual childhood, emotional

trauma. And then becomes a daily choice to ignore or rebel against the natural order of

life.

     Typically, a boy “misbonds” with his father before he’s five and bonds to a female that

is usually his mother. Then other boys sense his effeminate behavior and humiliate and

reject him. And often, a homophile offers the lonely, misdeveloped boy, “love” and

acceptance. The gay lifestyle is the psychological equivalent of a broken bone that wasn’t

set correctly before knitting itself back together.

     There are two specific psychological terms relating to the GLBT lifestyle; one is called,

“gender identity disorder,” and the other is called “gender dysphoria.” Simply put, it’s a

boy who doesn’t grow out of the “I don’t like girls” stage of male sexual development. Or,

vice-versa.

     The five divisions of homosexuality are...

     The Stockholm (syndrome) homosexual, who was seduced and/or graduated into

homosexuality by another, almost-always-older, male. The Effeminate homosexual who

over-relates to women, usually due to an absent or passive father, and/or an overbearing

mother. The Spotlight homosexual who’s rebelling against manlaw and loves the attention

and drama that homosexuality brings. The Vagifearian homosexual who’s terrified of

girls/women, usually due to older-female-on-younger-male sexual or physical or emotional

abuse. And finally, the rarest of all, the Normalphobe homosexual, who is without any

outward signs of homosexuality and doesn’t need or want attention, but can’t stand being

sexually normal. Every homosexual is in at least one of these five divisions.

    The eight divisions of lesbianism are...
    The two major categories; the Masculine lesbian, who’s decided to live her life as a man due to her appearance,  rugged personality, and masculine/protective nature.  (Most of these come from fatherless homes.)  And the Lipstick lesbian, who usually doesn’t believe that the human male is capable of the kindness, compassion, or empathy of the human female, and/or wants a penis-free “man.”  
   The four sub-categories are; the Disappointed lesbian, who’s decided to live her life having romantic, sexual relations with other females due to her disappointment with the sexuality and/or the weak and passive nature of modern men.  The Exotic lesbian (who’s almost always bisexual) who’s turned on by the sheer rebelliousness of the lesbian lifestyle and/or the attention that it brings.  The Feminist lesbian who sees sex with a man as an act of submission and oppression and just isn’t going to have sex with a man.  Then, there’s the type I care about the most, the Betrayed lesbian, who was sexually and/or emotionally abused by a male (usually her father or stepfather or mother’s boyfriend) usually when she was very young and wants no sexual contact with anyone with an actual, live-flesh, penis. 

    The eight types of lesbians are much more emotionally intertwined than the five types of homosexuals because the latter four types of lesbians; disappointed, exotic, feminist, and betrayed,  choose one of the former categories of masculine (a.k.a. “butch”) or lipstick.   Every lesbian that I’ve ever spoken to fits one of the two major categorizes and one of the four sub-categorizes. 

   The best examples I can give are Ellen DeGeneres and Portia de Rossi.  A betrayed-masculine lesbian with an exotic-lipstick lesbian.   And then there’s Rosie O’Donnell, who is clearly a feminist-masculine lesbian.

   (I wasn’t even going to attempt to categorize lesbians until I was challenged to do so.  Understanding the mind of the human female takes a heterosexual man at least twenty-five years of painful training.  At least twenty-five years!)

    Then there’s the omnisexual who can be a male or a female and will become whatever

 they think the other person/being wants to have sex with another (and I’m going to leave

 out the word “human”) being, whether that being is male or female, adult or child, human

 or non-human. 

     Now there’s the sad reality of same-sex marriage which adversely alters American

culture and absurdly removed the words “bride” and “groom” (for about five months,

until someone sued) from the marriage licenses in the state I live in.  Legalizing same-sex

marriage will legislate the acceptance of the gay lifestyle in the sex education classes of

schoolchildren.  This will discriminate against those who can’t afford to send their children

to religious or private schools. I mean no disrespect to the GLBT community, but I must

speak the truth. And, I have the right to speak out about that which degrades the culture in

which I live.

     The gay community has no right to redefine marriage, which should be between one

man and one woman who, love each other, share the same religion and/or values, and

aren’t blood relatives. When this, minimum-level-of-common-sense definition of marriage

is broken, any two (or more) humans can marry, including blood relatives. I can hear it

now... “My sister can’t have kids and we’re two consenting adults, why can’t we marry?”

Gay marriage isn’t like interracial marriage, it’s like consanguineous marriage; like a sterile

man marrying his consenting, adult sister. Or a woman marrying her brother because she’s

had a hysterectomy. Or a man marrying his mother because she’s too old to bear children.

      What about the inevitability of two people pretending to be gay to pay lower taxes or

cheaper healthcare? How could they be denied “marriage” if the one-man-one-woman,

common-sense definition, is changed?

     Marriage is about the appropriate joining of a man and a woman, not two people

merely playing the roles of husband and wife. You disagree? Fine. Time will prove my

point. I know what I know through experience and scripture.

     I’ve also noticed the attempt of the GLBT community to steal the nobility of the civil-

rights movement of the African-American/Black community. And I wish to point out that

it’s only those who cannot discern the difference between race and sexual behavior

who are deceived by this tactic.

     The homofascists in American society don’t want it to be known that, disassociating

with someone because of their behavior and oppressing someone because of the color of

their skin are two, vastly different things. Vastly different.

     The definition of a bigot used to be a person who thought that he/she was superior to a

person of color. This definition has been changed in an attempt to silence those who

acknowledge the truth about sexual behavior. When a gay person calls a straight person a

“bigot,” they are stealing the nobility of the African-American civil-rights movement.

     When were homosexuals taken from their homeland and sold into slavery? When were

homosexuals forbidden to learn how to read or forbidden to vote? When were members of

the GLBT community denied the right to own property or relegated to the back of the bus?

When were gays systematically and legally denied service in hotels and restaurants. When

where there water fountains with signs reading “Straight people only?” Isn’t equating race

with behavior the epitome of racism?

     How can I support people that define themselves by their sexual activities when

such activities should remain private? How can I interface with a mind that sees

homosexuality and heterosexuality as the same when billions of human beings, including

“gay” people, walk the Earth as a result of heterosexuality and not one human being has

been born as the result of a same-sex union? How can I get along with someone who

rejects their own genitals? How can I remain silent when men who have sex with other

men insult me?

     How can anyone’s fight against “hatred” be noble when the hatred is intentionally

provoked? Isn’t a homosexual calling me a homophobe the same thing as a man calling a

woman a lesbian because she won’t date him? Don’t I have the right to walk away from

those who insult and defame me? Don’t I have the same right to defend myself against

defamation as does the “gay” community?

     How can I support the mentality/lifestyle that launched NAMBLA and “bug chasing”

homosexuals that seek out AIDS? (Rolling Stone magazine issue 915, Feb. 6, 2003.)

How am I guilty of prejudging homosexuals when I hear about homosexuality up to

twelve times (I counted once) a day? And, until I’m actually throwing stones at a gay

person, I’m not in violation of the “Do not judge...”commandment of my Lord.

     Just as I wouldn’t associate with a man who was having safe, consensual sex with his

parent or adult sibling or adult child, I won’t associate with a man who has consensual sex

with other men. And the same people who wouldn’t want to hear about the sexual

activities of their married, biological parents, are the same people that vilify me for not

wanting to hear about two men sodomizing each other!

     Although heteroseparatism is about walking away from all or some members of the

GLBT community, it isn’t about hating or persecuting anyone. There’s anti-gay and

there’s pro-hetero. There’s standing against and there’s standing apart. There’s the red

pill of heteroseparatism verses the blue pill of homofascism.

      I’m not out to create laws to segregate gay people to the back of the bus, I’m out to

prevent laws that prohibit me from getting off of the bus when two men start French kissing

right in front of me. I’m not a heterosegregationist, I’m a heteroseparatist. I am separating

from the GLBT community and the homophobes of this world. And my stand isn’t against

gay people, my nonviolent stand is against gay propaganda.

     A heteroseparatist would never stand near the funeral or memorial of a gay person with

a “God hates fags” sign. And vandalism, proactive violence, and economic oppression (like

firing or not hiring a gay person), are not a part of heteroseparatism. Even when a

heteroseparatist is attacked by a homosexual, a homofascist, or a homoappeaser, (unless

the attack is physical) the aforementioned code-of-conduct still stands.

     I walk this Earth in a man’s body and I can say, with great compassion and great

 certainty, that; if you are male and over the age of puberty, and you are not solely

 attracted to the female of our species, you are perverse and self-deceived.

     And because of the insults, slander, and mischacterizations that I’ve received from

homofascists, (people who persecute people who won’t accept the concept that the GLBT

 lifestyle is normal) homoappeasers, (people who fear the scorn of the GLBT community)

and homosexuals, I will no longer associate with people who belong to these ideological

divisions. I’m done with homofascists, homoappeasers, homosexuals, and homophobes.

That’s it. No hatred. No fear. No ignorance. No assimilation. No surrender.

     And that’s it.  Version 1.1 (04 May 2009) of my internet manifesto.  (The paperback, The Heteroseparatist’s Manifesto, is currently under construction.)   My name is Carl Rowan Morris.  In cyberspace I am called “Mantronikk.”  I am the creator of the word, the author of this manifesto, the designer of the logo, and the World’s first heteroseparatist.